Tag Archive for: CSA

EuroISPA Contribution to the proposal on CSA 2.0. and the Directive on Simplification Measures and Alignment with the Cybersecurity Act

EuroISPA welcomes the European Commission’s proposals for a revised CybersecurityAct (CSA 2.0) and the accompanying NIS2 Simplification Directive as meaningful steps towards a stronger European cybersecurity framework.

At the same time, we believe further work is needed. Our key priorities:

  • Certification schemes must remain strictly technical
  • Reporting obligations must be harmonised across NIS2, CRA, GDPR and DORA, with a single audit principle
  • Supply chain risk assessments must be objective and evidence-based
  • Mandatory ICT asset phase-out must remain proportionate and economically sustainable manner
  • NIS2 simplification measures are essential to support SME and mid-cap operators and preserve competition
  • Internally developed tools not placed on the market should be exempted from certification requirements
  • Open source communities, SMEs, and independent developers must be recognised as key contributors to Europe’s cyber resilience

A secure and competitive European digital ecosystem requires a framework grounded in technical evidence, operational feasibility, and proportionality. We look forward to engaging with co-legislators on these important EU policy issues.

EuroISPA Contribution to the Cybersecurity Act Review

EuroISPA contributed to the online survey of the European Commission on the Cybersecurity Act, emphasising on the following considerations:

  • Preserve a technical focus in certification: Cybersecurity certification schemes should remain strictly technical, avoiding political or sovereignty-based criteria to maintain neutrality, credibility, and cross-border interoperability.
  • Reinforce ENISA’s role: ENISA should have a stronger mandate to harmonise standards across the EU, promote international standards, and ensure transparency and stakeholder involvement in certification development.
  • Simplify and harmonise regulatory frameworks: The CSA should align with other EU regulations (like NIS2, CRA, GDPR, DORA), introducing unified reporting thresholds and single incident-reporting points to reduce overlapping obligations.
  • Support SMEs with proportionate compliance: SMEs should be allowed to use simplified, self-declared compliance processes to avoid excessive regulatory burdens that could hinder their participation in the digital economy.
  • Exclude internal-use tools from certification: Software and tools developed in-house and not marketed externally should be exempt from certification, unless used in critical infrastructure, to prevent unnecessary regulation.
  • Protect open-source and small-scale developers: The CSA must account for the vital role of open-source and small developers by ensuring certification schemes are affordable, inclusive, and supportive of innovation and diversity.

Read more here.